A sweeping political crisis in Madagascar reached a dramatic turning point today as the military announced it had seized control of the country, following weeks of mass protests led primarily by Gen Z activists demanding government accountability and basic services.
Colonel Michael Randrianirina, commander of the elite CAPSAT military unit, declared on national radio that the armed forces had taken over governance, dissolving several key state institutions while leaving the National Assembly intact. At the same time, lawmakers in the lower house voted to impeach President Andry Rajoelina, who had attempted to dissolve Parliament in a last-ditch move to retain power.
Rajoelina, who faces mounting accusations of corruption and mismanagement, reportedly fled the country in fear for his life, possibly aboard a French military plane. His precise location remains undisclosed, and he has condemned the takeover as an “illegal coup.”
Roots of the Unrest: Water, Power, and Disillusionment
The protests, which began around September 25, 2025, were initially sparked by long-standing shortages in electricity and clean water in Antananarivo. But what began as service protests quickly expanded into broader demands for transparent governance, economic opportunities, and an end to entrenched corruption.
Over time, the movement became identified with Gen Z Madagascar, a decentralized youth-led collective leveraging social media platforms to mobilize support and coordinate demonstrations. Protesters adopted symbolic imagery, including a skull-and-crossbones motif now common among youth movements in Nepal and elsewhere.
Clashes between protesters and security forces turned deadly. The United Nations reports that at least 22 people have been killed and more than 100 injured in the unrest, though the government disputes these numbers.
Despite repeated concessions, including the dismissal of his cabinet, President Rajoelina failed to quell the public anger. On October 13, the revolt tipped when CAPSAT broke ranks with the government and threw its support behind the demonstrators, immediately altering the balance of power.
Into the Unknown: Political Transition Under Military Rule
With the military now in control, Madagascar faces a precarious period of uncertainty. The new leadership has announced it will suspend the Constitution, dissolve courts and electoral bodies, and govern via a transitional framework for up to two years, after which a constitutional referendum and elections are promised.
Critics warn that without a clear roadmap and robust civilian oversight, the transition risks degenerating into authoritarian rule. Many in Madagascar remain skeptical of military promises, calling instead for swift return to civilian governance and transparent institutions. “They need to hand over to a civilian administration quickly and have an election,” said one 68-year-old IT consultant in Antananarivo.
Supporters of the takeover, especially younger protesters, greeted the news with elation. “We’re so happy Andry Rajoelina is finally gone … We will start again,” said a high school student, noting that the youth feel they have been overlooked in national policy decisions for years. Yet even among them, some cautioned that the military must prove its sincerity. “I prefer to stay on my guard and see what they want to do,” said another activist.
Broader Implications & Regional Echoes
Madagascar’s crisis comes at a moment when youth-led movements are reshaping politics across continents. From protests in Nepal to uprisings in Morocco, Gen Z activists are flexing new forms of political influence, especially in contexts of weak institutions and widespread discontent.
For Madagascar, the stakes are high. The island nation is among the world’s poorest, with a largely under-20 population and deep structural deficits in infrastructure, health, education, and governance. The international community faces a delicate balancing act: affirming democratic norms while recognizing that the current system has been unresponsive to citizens’ needs.
As Madagascar enters this new era, uncertainties loom large. Who will hold the reins of power? Can Gen Z’s aspirations translate into tangible change? And will the military respect the democratic rights of a populace that has already defied expectations?
About the Author
